Institute report
Epistemic Security Economics
How verification, provenance, and their costs shape digital information systems.
Examines verification capacity, misinformation costs, and proposed approaches to provenance and auditing.
Institute initiative
Matcha Institute of Society and Economy
Research on the systems that shape everyday life.
01 / The reading room
What makes information trustworthy? Where does personal data go? What can a study really tell us? Explore five reports, with their sources and assumptions open to read.
Institute report
How verification, provenance, and their costs shape digital information systems.
Examines verification capacity, misinformation costs, and proposed approaches to provenance and auditing.
Institute report
How verification, provenance, and their costs shape digital information systems.
MISEExamines verification capacity, misinformation costs, and proposed approaches to provenance and auditing.Market report
Creative and technical imaging markets, workflows, and the assumptions behind the outlook.
LumaNorm Studio + MISEBrings market segments, workflow changes, technology, and scenario assumptions together for 2020–2026.Market report
The sensing, software, and data systems used to measure plants—and the barriers between them.
LumaNorm Studio + MISEReviews the 2016–2026 landscape, including calibration, interoperability, adoption, and reproducible measurement.Institute brief
A critical review of claims linking high cognitive ability with psychological and immune outcomes.
MISECompares selected surveys with population research, examining selection bias and alternative explanations.Institute brief
What stays on a device, what crosses a boundary, and what changes when intelligence runs locally.
LumaNorm Studio + MISEExamines privacy, trust boundaries, security, legal duties, and the limits of treating device locality as protection.Reading paths are an editorial guide to this collection. Every title opens its complete report.
02 / Our approach
MISE’s founding principles place research in context: the people affected, the assumptions made, and the possibility of being wrong.
Every finding comes
with a margin.
What would change the conclusion?
Make methods and assumptions explicit. Treat a finding as open to challenge, revision, and better evidence.
Whose experience is missing?
Consider people and communities within the institutions, markets, and environments that shape their lives.
Who carries the risk?
Bring privacy, consent, inclusion, and harm reduction into the work from the beginning.
Can someone follow the reasoning?
Explain the approach in plain language. Show the sources, the limits, and how the work can be examined.
What can another field see?
Make room for different methods and forms of knowledge, including experience from industry and communities.
What remains after the immediate result?
Consider wellbeing, fairness, and resilience over time, including effects on future generations.
The founding agenda
These initial areas guide the institute’s ambitions. The reading room above shows the work published so far.
03 / In conversation
The founding vision connects research, industry, and communities. If a question in your work belongs in that conversation, get in touch.
Contact MISE